What non-Digital SLR has the shortest shutter lag time when the flash is off?
Posted on Nov 27, 2008 under Digital news and reports |I have an older HP digital camera, and am looking to upgrade it. I just want a point and shoot, nothing particularly fancy. My biggest issue with my current camera is that it takes sooooooo long to take a picture when I turn the flash off, that the picture ends up distorted! From what I have read on here, it has to do with shutter lag, but I am not sure. I don’t know much about photography.
The other features I am looking for are:
-uses SD card memory
-rechargeable battery
-image stabilization
-slim design
I do not want an SLR, so please don’t suggest it, I know they are are more capable, but they are not what I am looking for. I just want a camera to carry in my purse for spontaneous photo opportunities!
Thank you.
November 27th, 2008 at 6:40 am
Most P&S camera makers seem to be afraid to list that “feature” in the specifications.
Here is a link to help reduce shutter lag.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/shutter-lag.htm
November 27th, 2008 at 6:40 am
As you said, available light photography (fancy term for no-flash photography) is something that is hard to acheive with a digital compact.
Basically, as you are not providing with sufficient lighting, the camera needs to keep the shutter open for a longer period of time so for it to be able to let enough light into the sensor for the picture to be taken. The problem is that as the shutter is open for a long period of time, any minimal movement or vibration the camera might experience distorts the image.
To avoid this, you can either use a faster lens (something impossible on a compact, as you cannot exchange lenses), boost up the ISO setting (light sensitivity), or use a tripod (although this won’t necessarily work when shooting under low-light condtions, unless the subject is still).
So, to make it short, you might want to check out compact cameras that have a high-ISO shooting option, and a good noise reduction processing system. This, together with any OPTICAL image stabilisation system, will provide enough solution to shoot under low-light conditions. My recommendation is to look for the latest Sony models, which I have personally tested and seem to work pretty good. Sony uses their propietary MemoryStick cards. I know Canon provides this solution as well, and almost all use SDs. Nevertheless, I haven’t tried their system myself, although I am almost certain they work as well as Sony’s, if not better (I would personally buy a Canon over a Sony anytime).
One drawback of high ISO is noise. This is inevitable. The only way of getting clean images despite of high ISO is shooting with an SLR, or a large-sensor camera. But then again, you made it clear you are not interested in those.
So basically try out the newest Canons and Sonys =)
Happy shooting!
November 27th, 2008 at 6:40 am
Shutter lag is a common annoyance. There is also a commonly little-known, simple but important thing you need to know to best deal with it. If you read through the document sited by “fhotoace”, it is buried in there. But let’s keep it simple…
When you take a picture, you should press down on the shutter button half-way and hold it there. When you do that the camera does it’s auto focus, the part that sometimes takes sooooo long. Keep holding the button half way down, then when you get the smile or pose you want, then push down the remaining half way down. That second push down will take the picture almost immediately, very little lag, even with flash. Try it, even with your slooooooow old HP.
Shutter lag is the sum of two parts. The first part is the “auto focus lag”, and takes almost all the total lag time, the focusing starts to happen when you hit the half-way down part of the shutter button. This “auto focus lag” is the part that is so much faster on a SLR type of camera. The second part is the “shutter release lag”, the part that physically triggers the shutter and starts recording the image. This second lag part of the total shutter lag is relatively fast for most modern so called “point and shoot” cameras.
I’ve also included my source which I think more directly deals with the specific problem. This is an excellent but very technical site.
I’m with you about not wanting to pay for and carry around a SLR all the time. Some people (I’ve meet them) buy a SLR after being so frustrated with their simple “point and shoot” camera and still don’t know what difference holding down the shutter half way can make. I find this out when taking pictures of people side by side and can see I can take the picture exactly when I want, even pictures where the action (window of opportunity) is fast.
If you have had distorted pictures before maybe it is because the focusing and shutter time took so long that you didn’t hold the camera steady long enough.
As far as which camera I like Panasonic, especially for their value and they do list there “shutter release lag” time in their specifications, plus they are fast, relative to other cameras in their class. They all have image stabilization (the first company to make that standard on all the models) they use SD cards and most have rechargeable battery and many are slim design. It comes down do how good a camera you want and how small you want to go.
Good luck.
November 27th, 2008 at 6:40 am
It sounds like your problem is a slow flash recharging time and low sensitivity (low ISO) and lastly, shutter lag. Try a Fuji camera because Fuji F-series has a long reputation for producing compact high ISO cameras. Check the weblink below it has all the feature you are requesting.
December 7th, 2011 at 8:46 am
Angry Birds Online…
[…]in the following are some web page links to websites online I always link to since we believe they really are seriously worth browsing[…]…
December 7th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
Entry Level Mechanical Engineering Jobs…
Entry Level Mechanical Engineering Jobs…
December 8th, 2011 at 6:14 pm
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.demo.getlisted.co.nz/pr-agencies-auckland…
December 12th, 2011 at 3:56 am
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.cedarlite.getlisted.co.nz/doors-auckland…
December 12th, 2011 at 9:58 pm
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.techrentals.getlisted.co.nz/hire-thermal-imaging-camera…
December 16th, 2011 at 8:27 am
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.lighthouse.getlisted.co.nz…
December 20th, 2011 at 7:39 pm
tramadol forum…
Interesting article. I’ve always been interested in this. Are you active on any forums? Your name looks familiar. …
December 26th, 2011 at 2:32 pm
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.proactivetelecom.getlisted.co.nz…
January 4th, 2012 at 9:48 pm
Solar Lights…
[…]following are a handful of url links to web pages which we link to for the fact we feel they are worthwhile checking out[…]…
January 6th, 2012 at 1:03 pm
Sites You Should Check Out…
http://www.e-psychic-readings.com/horoscope-yahoo…
January 14th, 2012 at 12:58 am
Gems from the Internet…
[…] I’d tried over a few blogs for new ideas and I did […]…
January 17th, 2012 at 4:44 pm
Lucas…
i really want to add your site link at my blog, because your site help me a lot…please give me an anchor text if you want to add your link at my blogroll……
January 20th, 2012 at 4:32 pm
………..
We guess for now i’ll be satisfied with book-marking as well as introducing your current Rss to be able to my personal Yahoo and google accounts. My spouse and i look ahead to fresh improvements and may share this site using my personal Myspace team….
January 28th, 2012 at 5:05 pm
No Deposit Poker…
My brother recommended I might like this website. He used to be entirely right. This post truly made my day. You can not consider just how much time I had spent for this information! Thanks!…